Simpson v. Denver & Rio Grande R.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Irion. M. L. Ritchie,, Judge. Action by' T. D. Simpson against the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad Company, upon two counts. Judgment for plaintiff upon one count, and for tbe defendant upon tbe other. Both parties appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtStraub, J.
Tbe facts are undisputed. Tbe case was presented on an agreed statement. Tbe substance of it is:
Tbe defendant operated a railroad and bad in its employ several thousand employees, who were paid on tbe 10th of each month for services rendered tbe previous month. At tbe end of each month it prepared a pay roll containing tbe names of tbe employees, their occupation, places employed, number of days worked, and tbe amount due. Pay checks were then prepared in which tbe date, tbe name of tbe employee, and tbe amount due were stated. Tbe paymaster with tbe pay car, tbe pay rolls, and checks…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shipman v. Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Robertson v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Harmon v. Old Detroit National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- United States v. National Exchange BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1891
- Emporia National Bank v. ShotwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Security-First Nat. Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Uriola v. Twin Falls Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Blomquist v. Zions First National Bank, N. A.Utah Supreme Court · 1966
- Santa Maria v. Industrial City Bank & Banking Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- N. M. Long Co. v. Kenwood Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.