Legal Opinion

Temple Beth AM v. Tanenbaum

Nassau County District Court

Decided November 1, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Scott Fairgrieve, J.

Issue

This case explores the liability of a member of a temple or *374church for dues imposed upon each member. There exists a paucity of law on this subject.

Background

Both plaintiff and defendants have moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff Temple Beth AM has commenced this action against a former member of its congregation to recover for dues owed in the amount of $1,270. The plaintiff characterizes the sum owed in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the complaint:

“fourth: That the defendant(s) did request certain work, labor, services, & materials from the plaintiff for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Allegheny College v. National Chautauqua County Bank of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Keuka College v. . RayNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. I. & I. Holding Corp. v. GainsburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Presbyterian Society v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API