Glasgow v. Hobbs
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Ripley Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.
The appellees sued the appellants and James L. and Abraham Yater, upon a promissory note executed in the firm name of Yater, Bro. & Co., and upon an account for goods and merchandise sold and delivered to the said firm. The two Yaters did not answer, nor were they defaulted. They seem to have dropped out of the case.
The appellants answered in four paragraphs. The first was a special plea of non est factum as to the note; the second, the general denial; the third, payment; the fourth was, in substance, as follows:
That the goods, for which the action was brought and for which the note was…
2Cited by10 opinions
- McKelvey v. Ches. & Ohio R'y Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
- Mount v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- American Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. SiskIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Fleetwood v. Dorsey Machine Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Sandford Tool & Fork Co. v. MullenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.