Legal Opinion
Faught v. Heckler
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided October 11, 1983No. Civ. 83-66-A, 83-132-APublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
STUART, Chief Judge.
Pursuant to state and federal policies presently in effect in the State of Iowa, when a member of an Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) grant group receives a nonrecurring lump sum payment (such as inheritance), the lump sum is treated as income to be automatically prorated over a period of months. This represents a change from the former practice of treating the lump sum as income in the month of receipt and as a resource thereafter if not totally expended during the month of receipt. The present policy, which results in cancellation of AFDC…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wolston v. Reader's Digest Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Tidewater Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Medical Center of Independence v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Isidra Callejas v. Linda McMahon and Margaret Heckler, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Donna Sweeney v. Joseph J. Murray, Margaret Heckler, Etc., Donna Sweeney v. Joseph J. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Faught v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Tustin v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Clark v. HarderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.