Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parkmed Associates v. New York State Tax Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1983Published

1Dissent

Levine, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. The majority’s disaffection with the obvious profit motive underlying the organization of the two Parkmed partnerships is readily understandable. Nevertheless, based upon the Tax Commission’s findings, the clear wording of the applicable regulation and established precedent, the taxpayers herein are entitled to the professional exemption from the unincorporated business tax (Tax Law, § 703, subd [c]). Undeniably, the partnerships were engaged in the practice of medicine. The Tax Commission expressly found that “petitioners owned and operated an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Tower v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Koner v. ProcaccinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Voorhees v. BatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Kahn & Jacobs v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. Matter of Kahn & Jacobs v. State Tax Comm'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API