Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Richard Knutson, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 26, 1995No. 93-1898-CRPublished

1DissentBrown, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority decision. I have no quarrel with the general policy considerations favoring corporate criminal liability. And it is indisputable that past Wisconsin cases have made corporations criminally liable for the acts of their agents. But I am convinced that those past cases were based upon statutes with substantially different wording than the statute in this case.

*112For example, the most often cited illustration favoring corporate criminal liability is Vulcan Last Co. v. State, 194 Wis. 636, 217 N.W. 412 (1928). The corporation desired to have the City of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. People v. Rochester Railway & Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. United States v. John Kelso Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1898
  4. State ex rel. Kropf v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Granite Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API