Legal Opinion

180s, Inc. v. Gordini U.S.A., Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 30, 2010No. Civil JFM-08-177PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.

180s, Inc. and 180s, LLC (collectively “180s”) sued Gordini U.S.A., Inc. for trade dress and patent infringement stemming from Gordini’s sale of certain ear warmers. This action is based on three of 180s’ patents: U.S. Patent No. 6,978,483 (“'483 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,212,645 (“ ’645 patent”), and U.S. Design Patent No. 545,-001 (“'001 design patent”). On March 12, 2010, I heard oral arguments pertaining to claim construction. This Opinion outlines my decisions on these issues. 1

I

A patent includes both elaim(s) and a specification. The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  4. 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  2. Chameleon Chairs, LLC v. Bethel Events Styling and Rentals LLC, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API