Legal Opinion

Slingwine v. Industrial Accident Board

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 4, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Deloris Slingwine appeals a decision of the Superior Court denying a writ of prohibition against enforcement by the Industrial Accident Board (the “Board”) of an order that Slingwine submit to certain medical tests. We consider today the meaning of the term “examination” under 19 Del. C. § 2343. The insurer for Slingwine’s employer requested that she submit to X-rays and other imaging tests, as well as nerve and muscle conduction studies. Slingwine refused and petitioned the Board for a ruling. The Board upheld the insurer’s request and ordered Slingwine to submit to the tests.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Fiduciary Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Home Insurance Co. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. Oney v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Burpulis v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  5. Trans-Americas Airlines, Inc. v. KentonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. X-Ray Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  2. Coleman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Selective Insurance Co. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  4. Coleman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API