State ex rel. Roush v. Hickson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 85.] THE STATE EX REL . ROUSH, APPELLANT , v. HICKSON, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Roush v. Hickson,
2024-Ohio-4741.] Mandamus—Inmate failed to state a mandamus claim because a direct appeal of his sentence was an adequate remedy in ordinary course of law—Court of appeals’ dismissal of complaint affirmed. (No. 2023-1536—Submitted July 9, 2024—Decided October 2, 2024.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Morrow County, No. 2022CA0005,
2023-Ohio-4114. __________________ The per curiam opinion below was joined…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tari v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- State ex rel. Martre v. Reed (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Ridenour v. O'Connell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. Romine v. McIntosh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. A.N. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Howard v. CondonOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
- State ex rel. Powell v. SheehanOhio Court of Appeals · 2026