Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Roush v. Hickson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2024No. 2023-1536PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 85.] THE STATE EX REL . ROUSH, APPELLANT , v. HICKSON, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Roush v. Hickson,

2024-Ohio-4741.] Mandamus—Inmate failed to state a mandamus claim because a direct appeal of his sentence was an adequate remedy in ordinary course of law—Court of appeals’ dismissal of complaint affirmed. (No. 2023-1536—Submitted July 9, 2024—Decided October 2, 2024.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Morrow County, No. 2022CA0005,

2023-Ohio-4114. __________________ The per curiam opinion below was joined…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tari v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State ex rel. Martre v. Reed (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State ex rel. Ridenour v. O'Connell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State ex rel. Romine v. McIntosh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State ex rel. A.N. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Howard v. CondonOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
  2. State ex rel. Powell v. SheehanOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API