People v. Encarnacion
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Román, J.
The salient issue on this appeal concerns the United States Constitution’s Confrontation Clause and whether the trial court, in allowing the prosecution to use a witness’s grand jury testimony in its case-in-chief, without producing the witness, violated defendant’s right of confrontation. Additionally, we are called upon to decide whether in allowing the prosecution to present DNA evidence through a witness who did not personally perform all of the DNA testing about which she testified, the trial court further violated defendant’s constitutional right of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. SmartNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- The People v. Darius DubarryNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. PealerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.