Legal Opinion

Williams v. Vreeland's Executors

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1879PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On motion to suppress depositions.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor.

This is a motion to suppress the evidence of two of the complainants. The suit was originally brought by Sarah A. Williams and Margaretta Taylor, and two others, against Cornelius Vreeland and Jane Folk, and six others. Vreeland and Eolk both died after they were in court, but before the time for answering had expired. They each left a will, and their executors, after obtaining letters testamentary, were made defendants, and have answered. The complainants, Sarah A. Williams and Margaretta Taylor, were subsequently examined as witnesses on their own call, and against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Underhill v. Van CortlandtNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  2. Richardson v. GoldenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1811
  3. Williamson v. MoreNew York Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hesselbrock v. First Nat. Bk., C., MontclairNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API