Allen Lubricating Co. v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
In this action, the respondent, Allen Lubricating Company, recovered against the appellant, Phoenix Indemnity Company, upon a contract of insurance evidenced by a written policy. In the court below, the appellant defended principally on two grounds: First, that the loss for which the recovery was had was not within the terms of the contract; and, second, that there was a breach of the conditions of the contract on the part of the respondent. In this court, the arguments in its brief are confined to these questions.
The respondent is a distributor of petroleum products. Its place of business is…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Cartier Drug Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935