At&t Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
AT&T Corporation, joined by intervenor MCI Telecommunications Corporation, petitions for review of an order of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) that purported to clarify a portion of a regulation on access to billing names and addresses issued earlier in the same rulemaking proceeding. AT&T contends that the “clarification,” prohibiting use of the names and addresses for marketing purposes, is a substantive modification of the regulation and that the FCC has failed to give any reasoned explanation for the change. We conclude that the FCC provided an adequate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Omnipoint Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Go Communications Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- American Water Works Ass'n v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Globalstar, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Liquid Energy Pipeline Association v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
- Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002