Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jefferson v. Jefferson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 26, 1941Published

1Dissent

Stacy, O. J.,

dissenting: It was said in Triplett v. Williams, 149 N. C., 394, 63 S. E., 79, that “all conveyances of land executed since the passage of the Act (ch. 148, Laws 1879, now C. S., 991) are to be taken to be in fee simple, unless the intent of the grantor is plainly manifest in some part of the instrument to convey an estate of less dignity.”

Here, we have a deed with all of its operative provisions conveying an estate in fee simple. Whitley v. Arenson, ante, 121. Following the description of the land conveyed are these words: “This deed is conveyed to the said grantee to him his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Wool v. Fleetwood.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. McIver v. . McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API