Legal Opinion

Culbertson Irrigating & Water Power Co. v. Olander

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1897No. 7300PublishedCited by 5 opinions

• Error from the district court of Hitchcock county. Tried below before Welty, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, C. J.

The defendant in error, Frank Olander, as plaintiff, in the district court of Hitchcock county recovered judgment against the Culbertson Irrigating & Water Power Company on account of the unauthorized construction by the latter of an irrigating ditch upon his, plaintiff’s, land.

In this proceeding to review the judgment mentioned we will first notice the contention that the plaintiff below failed to show such a title to the land described as will authorize him to recover for the alleged trespass. It was charged in the petition that the plaintiff therein entered said premises as a homestead…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Red River & Lake of the Woods Railroad v. StureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Carner v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Keith v. TilfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wagner v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF ROADSNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Sohler v. ChristensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Story v. SramekNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Whitcomb v. ProvostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Collett v. FrederiksenNebraska Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API