Shoemaker v. State

Ruffin, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Justin Shoemaker guilty of possessing methamphetamine, trafficking in methamphetamine, and possessing a firearm during the commission of a felony. Shoemaker appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of possessing methamphetamine. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. Shoemaker claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. “When reviewing a ruling on a motion to suppress, we view the evidence in a light favorable to the trial court’s…