Legal Opinion

Clements v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 22, 1997No. CR-96-0601PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joe Elbert Clements appeals his sentence after remand by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Clements's convictions for burglary in the third degree and possession of burglary tools, but remanded the cases to the Marengo Circuit Court for a new sentencing hearing. The Eleventh Circuit ruled that the trial court had not adequately determined whether Clements had knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel before allowing Clements to represent himself, pro se, at his sentencing hearing. R. 4. Clements appeals the sentences imposed at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  3. Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. Marc Wayne Holliday v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Burgin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API