Legal Opinion

Boyles v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 18, 1992No. 92-1208PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s sentence as an adult; however, we remand the case for the trial court to correct the written order to conform with the court’s oral findings at the two prior sentencing hearings.

At the first sentencing hearing the trial court orally analyzed the six statutory factors before sentencing appellant as an adult. The trial court specifically found that factors five and six did not apply, regarding appellant’s record, history and the likelihood of rehabilitation under the juvenile system. However, the court failed to reduce its findings, based on its analysis, to writing and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conboy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API