Hilton v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Covert, Murray County; TIarry 17. Fielding, Judge. Action by J. E. Bailey against Charles N. Hilton, wherein Frank Clark intervened. Judgment for plaintiff, .and defendant and intervener bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
BREWER, C.
Defendant in error, J. E. Bailey, and plaintiff in error, Frank Clark, made a wager of $200 each on a horse race to foe run some time thereafter; each depositing his money in the 'bands of Charles N. Hilton, who had been agreed upon as a .stakeholder. On the day upon which the race was .to have been run, Bailey refused to let his horse run, repudiated the contract of •wager, and demanded his money back from the stakeholder, who refused to return the same to him. After such refusal arpón the part of Bailey to let his horse run, Clark took ihis horse around the track alone, claimed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bernard v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Falkenberg v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Cleveland v. WolffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Deaver v. BennettNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Reynolds v. McKinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McLain v. Oklahoma Cotton Growers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Federal Life Ins. Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923