Legal Opinion

American Family Life Assurance Co. v. Queen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1984No. 68142PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Under a contract which denominated her as an independent con tractor, appellee sold American Family Life Assurance Company’s (“AFL”) insurance products. The complaint under which this case was eventually submitted to a jury was filed in 1982 against AFL and the individual appellants, all of whom are or were associated with AFL. The theory of recovery advanced by appellee was that the appellants interfered with her business. The complaint set out specific ways in which the appellants effected that interference, including misrepresentations made to appellee’s customers,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Haskins v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Wise v. State Board for Examination, Qualification & Registration of ArchitectsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  4. Melton v. BowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Mendel v. PinkardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. Hillside Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Glenn McClendon Trucking Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Bellamy v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Smoky, Inc. v. McCrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. C & W Land Development Corp. v. KaminskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API