Legal Opinion · Dissent

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Travis Insulation Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 24, 1949No. 4-8912Published

1DissentHolt, J.

I respectfully dissent for the reason that I think the present case is controlled by the decision of this court in Missouri Pacific Rd. Company v. Barnes, 197 Ark. 199, 121 S. W. 2d 896. The situation in that case was similar in effect to that presented here. Here, the lease was between the Arkansas Sales Company and appellant, and it appears that Hamilton and Travis stored property in the building which was on appellant’s right-of-way.

The lease provided against subleasing any part without written notice to appellant. Sections 10 and 16 in the present lease contain the following provisions:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Missouri Pacific R.R. Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API