Legal Opinion

Smith v. Clark

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1852PublishedCited by 4 opinions

A motion was made by Mr. Woodbury to docket and dismiss this case under the 43d rule of this court. The .case purported to be an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. The certificate of the clerk of the Circuit Court is set.forth in the order passed by this court, and to be found at the end of this report. It is, therefore, unnecessary to repeat it.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taney

A motion has been made to docket and dismiss this case, under the 43d rule of this court.

The certificate of the clerk states, that, in the Circuit Court of Massachusetts, in a cause depending in that court, in which Francis O. J. Smith was complainant in equity, and Joseph W. Clark and others were respondents, a final decree in that court was made on the 17th of October, 1850, in favor of the said Joseph W. Clark and others, respondents, from which the said Francis O. J. Smith appealed on the same day; and'1 on the 30th of October filed his appeal-bond with sureties, whereby execution on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deneale and Others v. STUMP'S EXECUTORS.Supreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. Holliday v. BatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1846

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gumbel v. PitkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. State ex rel. Andreu v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  3. The City of LincolnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1883
  4. Van Horn v. The NatchezU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API