Williams v. Hofmann Balancing Techniques, Ltd.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. EYLER, Judge.
This case presents the issue of whether an amended complaint, for purposes of the statute of limitations, relates back to the date of filing of the original complaint. The Circuit Court for Baltimore City held that it did not and entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants. We disagree, vacate the judgment, and hold that the amendment does relate back to the date of filing of the original complaint.
Factual Background
We shall set forth only those background facts — procedural and otherwise — necessary to decide the issues presented. To assist in understanding a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Riverdale Heights Volunteer Fire Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Castiglione v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. State ex rel. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Crowe v. HouseworthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Zappone v. Liberty Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Gilbert v. U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & ExplosivesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Sledz v. Flintkote Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Ferguson v. LoderCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Fortney & Weygandt, Inc. v. Lewiston DMEP IX, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.