Legal Opinion

Bouknight v. State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 7, 1930No. 12943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabeer.

This is a suit for damages for injuries to person and property. The complaint contains two causes of action. For a first cause, the plaintiff alleged that, on December 9, 1929, while he was driving his Ford sedan along the Dixie highway between Trenton and Edgefield, on his right-hand side of the road at about twenty miles per hour, he met and collided with a tractor of the defendant; that as a result of the collision he received severe and painful bodily injuries, which were due to and caused by the negligent acts of the defendant,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lower Main St. Bk. v. Caledonian Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Templeton v. C. & W. C. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  3. Leitner v. Columbia Rwy., Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. BostSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Morrison v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API