Legal Opinion

Smith v. Mullins

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 15, 1860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 44- APPEAL FROM PENDLETON CIRCUIT COURT. cited Civil Code, secs. 369 and 373. cited Civil Code, secs. 577, 580.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stites

delivered the opikion of the codrt:

In May, 1856, Mullins, sued Smith upon two notes, setting up both in the same petition, but in distinct paragraphs. Smith appeared and answered, but subsequently withdrew his answer, and permitted judgment to go. The clerk, however, in making the order of judgment, failed to notice the smaller note, and only entered judgment for the amount of the larger one— reciting in the judgment that that was the amount claimed in the petition.

Afterwards, Mullins withdrew the note thus omitted without leave of court, and assigned it to Fennessy, who sued Smith thereon in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hopkins v. AlvisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1820

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Combs v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Jeffers v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Ross v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API