Legal Opinion

Ragusa v. Chi Yeung Lau

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 13, 1990PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

This appeal explores the appropriate method for polling a jury in a civil case. Plaintiff Gaspare Ragusa and his parents sued Dr. Lau and other defendants not involved in this appeal, alleging medical malpractice. “Plaintiff” hereafter refers to Gaspare; “defendant” refers to Dr. Lau.

I

Plaintiff claims that Dr. Lau misdiagnosed a neck injury that plaintiff had suffered in a diving accident. At trial the court required a special verdict on the issues of negligence and proximate cause. Misreading the verdict, the foreman initially reported…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General MotorsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hake v. Manchester TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Grow Company, Inc. v. ChokshiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  2. Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Kejoo Ahn v. Chung KimSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. WASTE MGMT. NJ, INC. v. Union County Utils. Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  5. A.T. v. CohenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API