Legal Opinion

Magras v. Puerto Rican American Insurance

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided November 19, 1982No. Civ. No. 82-51PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChristian, Chief Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This case puts into issue the legal basis, if any, on which an injured person may recover from an insurer a judgment previously entered against its insured. Plaintiffs obtained, in a separately docketed action in this Court, a default judgment against two persons insured under an automobile insurance policy issued by defendant. Magras v. Raimer, Civ. No. 78-285 (D.V.I. Order of Jan. 3, 1980). Plaintiffs now seek to recover that judgment directly from the insurance carrier.

The general rule is that in the absence of an applicable statute or of a “public liability” provision…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shingleton v. BusseySupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McConnaughyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Lewis v. Home Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1973
  4. Singh v. AugustDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. RobertsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dorchester Insurance Company and Janak Ramchandani v. Renzo R. OdiottSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2026
  3. Isaac v. Guardian Insurance Co.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API