Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Tom Cain

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 23, 1909No. 4103PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Erom Wichita County. Original application for writ of habeas corpus for release from commitment under an arrest for a violation of a city ordinance, establishing fire limits and prescribing character of building, etc. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

E AH SET, Judge.—Appellant

presents his application for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging in substance that he is illegally restrained of his liberty and confined by the city marshal of the city of Wichita Falls, and that he is so restrained by virtue of a certain warrant of arrest issued upon a complaint charging him with the violation of a certain city ordinance of the city of Wichita Falls, attached to his application. It is alleged that this ordinance is unconstitutional and void, and that he ought not to be restrained of his liberty by reason of any alleged violation of the same. Attached…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CoxCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Ex Parte HeidlebergCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McKayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Ex Parte DraneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Ex Parte GrundyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. First Nat. Bank of Giddings v. Lee County Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Chemgas v. TynanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API