Patterson v. Board of County Commissioners

This case is entirely similar to that of Hunt v. Allen County, 82 Kan. 824, except that in this case, while the corporation is a foreign corporation, it has its principal office in the state of Kansas, whereas in the .Hunt case the principal office of the company was not in the state of Kansas and the corporation, through its principal office or agent, could not be required to list the capital stock.

*225Section 9229 of the General Statutes of 1909 (Laws 1908, ch. 80, § 1) provides:

“That no person shall be required to include in the list of personal property any portion of the capital stock of any…