Legal Opinion

Ver Planck v. Godfrey

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1900Published

Motion to vacate an order of publication in an action of foreclosure.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventbitt, J.

The action is to foreclose a mortgage and application is made to vacate an order of publication. While the allegations tending to show the inability with due diligence to make personal service of the summons are intrinsically weak and are fairly open to the criticism that the efforts made disclose a failure to follow up the ordinary channels pursued in order to obtain information, the more serious defect is a noneompliance with section 440 of the Code of Civil Procedure in that the post-office in which the copies are directed to be deposited is not specified in the order. *55The order provides…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eleventh Ward Bank v. PowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Smith v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Walter v. De GraafThe Superior Court of New York City · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API