Legal Opinion

State v. Hooper

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 4, 2010No. Nos. 27871-9-III; 27872-7-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

¶1 When determining whether to relieve a petitioner of his duty to register as a sex offender for a crime he committed as a juvenile, a court must consider the nature of a registerable offense and criminal and relevant noncriminal behavior and “may consider other factors.” RCW 9A.44.140(4). The juvenile court in Spokane County requires that those petitioning to be relieved of their obligations to register as sex offenders take a polygraph test and undergo a psychological evaluation. And the court here denied petitions for relief from registration because the petitioners did not satisfy these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. TempletonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. GossageWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. State v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Of Washington v. Jerry NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API