Trego v. Roosevelt Mining Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Aepeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant county: Geoege Olementson, Circuit Judge. This is an action to recover the balance of the contract price for the erection of a roasting and separating plant for the defendant, the Roosevelt Mining Company. The plaintiff, in consideration of $6,500, agreed to erect for defendant one complete roasting and separating plant as specified in the contract of sale. The roaster is spoken of as the “Trego” roaster.
Read the full summary
Aepeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant county: Geoege Olementson, Circuit Judge. This is an action to recover the balance of the contract price for the erection of a roasting and separating plant for the defendant, the Roosevelt Mining Company. The plaintiff, in consideration of $6,500, agreed to erect for defendant one complete roasting and separating plant as specified in the contract of sale. The roaster is spoken of as the “Trego” roaster. The contract provided that payment of parts of the contract price should he made at specified times during construction, and that the…
1Opinion of the CourtSiebeckeR, J.
The questions submitted in the special verdict show that the court held that plaintiff’s action was to recover the balance of the purchase price for the roaster plant specified in the contract of the parties, and that defendant counterclaimed damages for a breach of the agreement that the plant, when completed, would “handle twenty-five tons of mill concentrates from said second parties’ mill, providing the same do not carry more than thirty per cent, iron and four per cent, calcium carbonate, in each twenty-four hours of steady running, and that the finished product from the process will not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fuller-Warren Co. v. ShurtsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Johnson v. Town of HighlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905