Legal Opinion

State v. Hunter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 6, 2011No. 4D09-2533PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The state appeals a downward departure sentence granted by the trial court because of the defendant’s medical condition. It claims that competent substantial evidence did not support the trial court’s decision to depart, because the defendant proved neither amenability to treatment nor that treatment was unavailable in the prison system. We disagree and affirm.

A trial court’s decision to grant a downward departure is a two-step process. State v. Alonso, 31 So.3d 265, 266 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). “First, the court must determine whether it can depart, i.e., whether there is a valid legal ground…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Banks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. State v. BostickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. State v. GattoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. State v. PetringeloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. State v. HillhouseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Florida v. Harry James ChubbuckSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  2. State v. ChubbuckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. State v. OwensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. McGrill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API