Legal Opinion

Martin v. Clements

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1917No. 7759PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, C. J.

Appellee sued appellant for the possession of a tract of land and caused a writ of sequestration to issue. The writ was executed February 5, 1916, and by the sheriff taken possession of, and on the same day citation was served on the appellant. On February 14, 1916, appellant executed a replevin, bond and retained possession of the land. Appellant failed to answer, and on March 7, 1916, said cause was regularly called for trial, and judgment by default was regularly entered for the appellee.

On April 13, 1916, appellant filed a motion for a new trial, alleging in substance that the time he was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TempletonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Tinsley v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. EarnestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Thomas v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Grice v. HennessyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Mutual Oil Consolidated v. BeaversCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Jaresh v. JareshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API