Legal Opinion

People v. Guinta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the defendant’s claim that his statements to the police were involuntarily made. Defendant voluntarily went to police headquarters and willingly submitted to interrogation. He was told initially that he was free to leave. He was not physically abused, mistreated, or coerced in any way. Defendant was advised of his Miranda rights on three occasions and each time agreed to waive them. The length of the interrogation, without more, does not render the statements obtained during that period inadmissible (People v Tarsia, 50 NY2d 1,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. TarsiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. ZaborskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. TowndrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. HalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API