Legal Opinion

Mazariegos-Paiz v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 25, 2013No. 19-1609PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

Our consideration of the petition for judicial review in this immigration case starts with a jurisdictional puzzle. After piecing together this puzzle, we hold, as a matter of first impression in this circuit, that the administrative exhaustion requirement is satisfied as to particular issues when the agency, either on its own initiative or at the behest of some other party to the proceedings, has addressed those claims on the merits, regardless of whether the petitioner himself raised them. 1 This holding establishes our authority to review the issues advanced in the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Hernan Portillo-Flores v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  2. L-A-B-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
  3. Sonia Perez Vasquez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  4. Adeyanju v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
  5. Meng Hua Wan v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API