Legal Opinion
ImprimisRx, LLC v. OSRX, Inc.; Ocular Science, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 20, 2026No. 3:21-cv-01305Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IMPRIMISRX, LLC, Case No. 21-cv-01305-BAS-DDL 11 Plaintiff, 12 ORDER: v. 13 (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ 14 FEES UNDER THE LANHAM OSRX, INC.; OCULAR SCIENCE, INC., 15 ACT; AND Defendants. 16 (2) DENYING WITHOUT 17 PREJUDICE DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ 18 FEES UNDER THE COPYRIGHT 19 ACT 20 (ECF No. 385) 21 22 23 Presently before the Court is Defendants OSRX, Inc. and Ocular Science, Inc.’s 24 Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. (Mot., ECF No. 385.) Defendants argue they are entitled to 25…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. Giganews, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.