Legal Opinion
Bamco 18 v. Reeves
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 25, 1988No. 87 Civ. 5496 (RWS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bamco 18 (“Bamco”) has moved by way of letter application to compel the production of accountants’ documents pertaining to ventures of defendant R. Bruce Reeves (“Reeves”).1 On behalf of his accountant, Pannell Kerr Forster (“PKF”), Reeves has resisted production of these documents as they relate to a limited partnership venture in Maryland known as the Laurel Motel (the “Laurel”) on the grounds that they are protected by Maryland’s accountant-client privilege. For the reasons set forth below, Reeves will be required to produce the documents.
Background
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Norlin Corp. v. Rooney, Pace Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- John P. Loebig v. George H. LarucciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Application of CepedaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lego v. Stratos Lightwave, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Hercules, Inc. v. Martin Marietta Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1992
- Anas v. BleckerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1992
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990