Legal Opinion

Badger v. President, &c. Bank of Cumberland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 15, 1847PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit for money paid and money had and received. All the evidence written and parol, saving that there was no copy of the bond, is found in the exceptions, but the facts in the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court. The trial was before Tenney J. The counsel for the defendants seasonably objected to the ¡proof of any declarations or sayings of any officer of the Bank.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit for money paid and money had and received. All the evidence written and parol, saving that there was no copy of the bond, is found in the exceptions, but the facts in the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court. The trial was before Tenney J. The counsel for the defendants seasonably objected to the ¡proof of any declarations or sayings of any officer of the Bank. After a statement of all the evidence the exceptions conclude thus: — “ The counsel for the Bank contended, that the only interest which it had in the ship was by virtue of Nutter’s bond, which gave it no…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court, Shepley J. being a stockholder in the Bank and taking no part in the decision, was drawn up by

Tenney J.

This action is for the recovery of the amount of the disbursements on account of one third part of Ship Hermitage, which the plaintiff contends was the property of the defendants, or which for the time was used and treated by them as such. The plaintiff was the owner of the residue of the ship and was ship’s husband.

To prove the title of the defendants, there was introduced *433evidence of a former ownership by one Nutt.er; a bond from Nutter to the Bank, dated Sept. I,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. The BANK OF COLUMBIA v. PATTERSON’S Adm’rSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  3. Lamb v. DurantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Belknap v. BelknapSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Scudder v. Calais Steamboat Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1860
  3. Richardson v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API