Legal Opinion

Kupferman v. Katz

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel M. Gold, J.

This is a motion (1) for a judgment declaring Proposition Number One for the approval of Local Law No. 51 for the year 1963 invalid and void, and (2) to enjoin respondents the City Clerk and the New York City Board of Elections from submitting Proposition Number One to the city’s voters at the general election to be held on November 5, 1963. The motion is made in a special proceeding brought by Theodore R. Kupferman, one of the members of the City Council.

Local Law No. 51 was adopted by the Council in August, 1963 and thereafter approved by the Mayor. It provides for the Mayor’s appointment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of City of New York (Ely Avenue)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. McCabe v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Matter of Astwood v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Herlands v. SurplessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  5. Matter of Herlands v. SurplessNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Silberman v. KatzNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Barr v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Fossella v. DinkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Wessendorf v. DonohueNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Young v. WagnerNew York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API