Legal Opinion

Downey v. Sheriff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1972No. 6729Published

1Opinion of the Court

*15OPINION

2Per curiam

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether or not the appellant is entitled to a writ of habeas corpus discharging her from restraint and prohibiting further prosecution when the state secures a continuance of a scheduled preliminary examination by means of an affidavit1 containing inaccurate statements of fact.2 Upon the strength of the state’s affidavit, the magistrate granted a two week continuance. The appellant petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, which was denied, and this appeal followed.

The issue thus presented must be answered in the negative. While the prosecutor…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Maes v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. AustinNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Stockton v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API