Downey v. Sheriff
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*15OPINION
2Per curiam
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether or not the appellant is entitled to a writ of habeas corpus discharging her from restraint and prohibiting further prosecution when the state secures a continuance of a scheduled preliminary examination by means of an affidavit1 containing inaccurate statements of fact.2 Upon the strength of the state’s affidavit, the magistrate granted a two week continuance. The appellant petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, which was denied, and this appeal followed.
The issue thus presented must be answered in the negative. While the prosecutor…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Hill v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Maes v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. AustinNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- Stockton v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1971