Tryon v. Square D Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarpinello, J.
We agree with the majority’s resolution of all issues on this appeal with only one exception, namely, its finding that Supreme Court properly denied the motion for summary judgment by defendant Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation. We therefore respectfully dissent on this issue alone. In our view, liability against Niagara Mohawk is limited by the doctrine of proximate cause.
While conflicting expert evidence has been submitted concerning the precise cause of the explosion, none of the conflict relates to the precise question of whether any act or omission on the part of Niagara Mohawk was a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Sheehan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Danielenko v. Kinney Rent a Car, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rodriguez v. Pro Cable Services Co. Limited PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.