Legal Opinion

Autry, House & Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1924No. 15774PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

“There can be no legal verdict in favor of the plaintiff in execution in a claim case unless there is introduced in evidence at the trial a valid, unsatisfied execution in favor of the plaintiff in execution against the defendant in execution.” Collins v. Hill, 115 Ga. 465 (1) (41 S. E. 678).(a) In the instant case, while the bill o.f exceptions specifies the execution as a part of the record material to a clear understanding of the errors complained of, and while the execution is copied in the rqcoi'd transmitted to this court, it does not appear that it was actually introduced in evidence;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blackstock v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Collins v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Usry v. Augusta Southern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API