Legal Opinion

Cigna Insurance v. Brisson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 16, 1988No. 87-181Published

1Opinion

Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing

March 21, 1988

Steele Hays, Justice.

Our decision in this case, released on February 16,1988, was wrong. We dismissed the appeal because we regarded it as an attempt to appeal from an order denying a motion by the defendant, Cigna, to dismiss the action. We said that because the order was not final it was not appealable. Ark. R. App. P. 2; Heffner v. Harrod, 278 Ark. 188, 644 S.W.2d 579 (1983).

By petition for rehearing Cigna has pointed out that such an order is appealable, even though it does not dispose of the action, when it is entered more than ninety days…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. Louis & North Arkansas Railroad v. BrattonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Board of Equalization v. Evelyn Hills Shopping CenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Schueck Steel, Inc. v. McCarthy Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Burgess v. BurgessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Hayden v. HaydenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API