Legal Opinion

Gossett v. Ullendorff

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 5, 1934PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

— The appeal in this case is taken from two orders of the chancellor. One was made November 1, 1932, denying a motion by the complainant to strike certain parts of the separate answers of Eugene Ullendorff and Florida National Bank & Trust Company. The other order denied a motion of the complainant to set aside a decree pro confess o entered by the clerk of the court against the complainant on a portion of the answer of Eugene Ullendorff in which was set up a counter claim, or matter in the nature of such a claim. The order pro confesso was entered by the clerk on October 19, 1932, and rested…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dudley v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  2. Benedict v. WilmarthSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. Cobb v. TrammellSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Harrell v. HarrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1858
  5. Saxon v. RawlsSupreme Court of Florida · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Gammon v. CobbSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. A----. B v. C----. DIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  5. G.F.C. v. S.G.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API