Legal Opinion

Suburban Mortgage Associates, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 12, 2007No. 2006-1207PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to reexamine the jurisdictional boundary between the Tucker Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, as that boundary is understood in the light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bowen v. Massachusetts. 1 The case began as a dispute between plaintiff Suburban Mortgage Associates, Inc. (“Suburban”), and defendants, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) et al. (“Government”), 2 with regard to a contract for insurance. Plaintiff sued the Government in the United States District Court for the District of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. Megapulse, Inc. v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. Transohio Savings Bank v. Director, Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  5. Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Suburban Mortgage Associates, Inc. v. United States Department Of Housing And Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API