Legal Opinion
Lord Day & Lord, Barrett, Smith v. Broadwall Management, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard F. Braun, J.
This is an action for an account stated, quantum meruit and breach of contract. Plaintiff claims that it is owed attorney’s fees for the provision of legal services. Defendant estate of *519Louis Foil (Estate) moves to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction over the person of said defendant, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8). Plaintiff moves for partial summary judgment and for an immediate trial pursuant to CPLR 3212 (c). Defendants Martin Bernstein (Bernstein) and Estate cross-move to dismiss the action against them pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), due to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Buran v. CoupalNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mondello v. New York Blood CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gershel v. PorrNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Rich v. LefkovitsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Day v. Broadwall Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003