Case v. Mountain Timber Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
At Law. Action by Willard Case against the Mountain Timber Company. The following authorities are relied upon by plaintiff: Harkrader v. Wadley, 172 U. S. 148, 19 Sup. Ct. 119, 43 L. Ed. -399; Prout v. Starr, 188 U. S. 537, 23 Sup. Ct. 398, 47 L. Ed. 584; Thompson v. Whitman, 18 Wall. 457, 21 L- Ed. 897; So. Pacific Co. v. Denton, 146 U. S. 202, 13 Sup.
Read the full summary
At Law. Action by Willard Case against the Mountain Timber Company. The following authorities are relied upon by plaintiff: Harkrader v. Wadley, 172 U. S. 148, 19 Sup. Ct. 119, 43 L. Ed. -399; Prout v. Starr, 188 U. S. 537, 23 Sup. Ct. 398, 47 L. Ed. 584; Thompson v. Whitman, 18 Wall. 457, 21 L- Ed. 897; So. Pacific Co. v. Denton, 146 U. S. 202, 13 Sup. Ct. 44, 36 L. Ed. 942; Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S. 714, 24 L. Eid. 565; Freeman v. Howe, 24 How. 450, 16 L. Ed. 749; Buck v. Calbath, 3 Wall. 334, 18 L- Ed. 257; Taylor v. Taintor, 16 Wall. 366, 21 L. Ed. 287; Ex parte Crouch, 112 U. S. 178, 5…
1Opinion of the Court
CUSHMAN, District Judge.
This matter was, so far as the issues made by defendant in its separate answer and the reply and answer .of the plaintiff thereto are concerned, tried to the court upon written stipulation, without a jury.
[ 1 ] The defense set. up is that of res adjudicata; that plaintiff is barred and estopped from further urging his cause of action, aa set out in his complaint, because he was heard thereon in the district court of Douglas country, Neb., in a cause in which both the plaintiff and defendant here were parties, which cause was entitled “Robert J. Tate and Robert Y.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Powers v. Blue Grass Building & Loan Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1898
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. City of TacomaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington · 1911
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. City of TacomaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1912