Legal Opinion
State v. Nelson
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 20, 1963No. 5167PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The defendants stipulated as to the following facts:
“This stipulation is filed in conjunction with the defendants’ motion for a new trial based on the claim that under Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643, decided June 19, 1961, certain evidence used against the defendants was illegally obtained and inadmissible.
“1. The circumstances leading to the apprehension of Russell Nelson are as follows: Police officers in Nashua, at 12:51 A. M., Monday, February 9, 1959 observed a 1959 light colored Chevrolet automobile with one occupant, Robert Almonte, proceeding north on Main Street. As the car passed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. BoisvertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Parker L. Hancock, Warden v. Russell NelsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- Robert Breest v. Everett I. Perrin, Jr., Warden, New Hampshire State Prison, Frederick J. Martineau v. Richard T. McCarthy Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- State v. LemireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Nelson v. HancockDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.