Studstill El v. Michigan Department of State
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Herbert Studstill El, a Michigan resident proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court that, upon examination, unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).
Seeking monetary and injunctive relief, Studstill El filed a complaint against the Michigan Department of State (MDS), alleging that MDS suspended his driving *822privileges in violation of his rights under the Moorish Zodiac Constitution and the First, Fourth, Fifth,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jessie Harrison v. State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Ernst v. RisingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Javier Luis v. Joseph ZangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bradley v. Michigan, State ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Clark v. Michigan State PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Kindrow v. BensonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Vernon Proctor v. Bd. of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Willis v. Saginaw CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021