Legal Opinion

Studstill El v. Michigan Department of State

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 17, 2017No. 16-2165PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Herbert Studstill El, a Michigan resident proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court that, upon examination, unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

Seeking monetary and injunctive relief, Studstill El filed a complaint against the Michigan Department of State (MDS), alleging that MDS suspended his driving *822privileges in violation of his rights under the Moorish Zodiac Constitution and the First, Fourth, Fifth,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Jessie Harrison v. State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Ernst v. RisingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. Javier Luis v. Joseph ZangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Michigan, State ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  2. Clark v. Michigan State PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  3. Kindrow v. BensonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  4. Vernon Proctor v. Bd. of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  5. Willis v. Saginaw CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API